Carl DeMaio for San Diego Mayor?
When we started talking about the pension crisis, as a government watchdog when I started shining a light on the city of San Diego’s financial problems, what did the special interests, lobbyists, and the labor unions say? And the politicians, and a Republican mayor? What did they say in 2003?
“Pay no mind. Nothing’s wrong. It’s all good. These government pensions are fine…”
We know all too painfully what the record has been. Those pensions have run up a debt that we now have to grapple with. They’ve resulted in cuts in our services in every neighborhood. We’ve seen our roads now fall apart, and our roads are now worse than the East coast roads where they have snow and sleet.
This is clearly not a new crusade for DeMaio. In 2006, he “helped craft and sponsor” Propositions B and C, giving voters final say on pension benefit increases, and requiring competitive bidding for city functions. In 2010 he led the fight to defeat the proposed San Diego tax increase—an increase that was supported, with time and money, by other San Diego politicians including most of the city council1 and mayor Jerry Sanders, and the government unions, to the tune of half a million dollars, outspending the “no” campaign by over 50%.
He’s a major reason San Diego is now on the road to a defined contribution plan instead of the defined benefits plan that is bankrupting cities across the nation.
Remember when the mayor, the council, and the unions said “don’t be talking about that pension reform business. Because it’s all locked into contracts that we can’t change anyway, so raise your taxes, cut your services, let your roads go to pot, you can’t do anything about it, accept your fate.”
No. I’m a businessman.
I read my contracts.
And the one thing that the labor unions have learned with me… to fear… is this phrase: “Gentlemen, I have read the contract, and I’m exercising every single right of the taxpayers.”
He has a history of winning tough fights against the establishment.
On June 3, 2008 Carl DeMaio was elected to the San Diego City Council to represent District 5. Carl made history as a non-incumbent taking a Council seat by the widest margin in a primary-winning 66% of the vote.
DeMaio also gets the tea party movement. He called it “the conscience of the accountable government movement”. He also gets reform: “you start with the simple ideas and implement them first.”
He’s also running, in one sense at least, a very unconventional campaign. The centerpiece of his campaign is “A Roadmap to Recovery”. It’s nearly 90 pages of specific reforms that put San Diego back in the black and, among other things, fixes the roads. I was originally going to say that he’s the Chris Christie of San Diego, but he’s not. He’s our Paul Ryan—but one of the reasons Paul Ryan isn’t running for president is that by conventional wisdom, putting out a specific plan opens you up to specific criticism. It means that all of the special interests that will be hurt by that plan will fund your opponents.
DeMaio recognizes this. But “voters don’t deserve, and should not accept, a slogan and a smile from their next mayor. They should insist on specifics… We do not have to accept the failed style of leadership of the politicians that got us into this mess.”
We’re not going to come in and punish. We’re going to give you something that you never gave the taxpayers in all the years of negotiations. We’re going to give you a fair deal… [and] under my labor contracts, the promises I make, I will be able to keep them, because I can afford them. And you will work for a financially stable city government, and not one on the verge of bankruptcy.
That really ought to count for something.
In response to California 2012: 2012 is going to be a very important election for San Diego. Do we continue to reform the city’s financial state, or do we resume the path to insolvency?
There are eight members of the San Diego City Council; six are Democrats and two Republicans. The six Democrats voted for the tax increase; the two Republicans, Carl DeMaio and Kevin Faulconer, voted against it.↑