From: [UK 09365] at [ukpr.uky.edu] Newsgroups: info.firearms.politics Subject: GunTalk: Waco article Date: 29 Oct 93 04:51:26 GMT (from The Detroit News, 4/23/93, 11A) Paul Craig Roberts Gun control laws forced Waco disaster If Rodney King's civil rights were violated in Los Angeles, what happened in Waco, Texas? If a billy club is excessive force, what is a tank? If four Los Angeles police officers--their adrenalin flowing from exertions to subdue a resisting, large, strong man--used bad judgment in ap- plying force, what kind of judgment was exercised by President Clinton, Atty. Gen. Janet Reno and the FBI in the relative calm of their Washington offices? The Branch Davidians are not a preferred minority, but their civil rights were nevertheless violated. The federal officials responsible must be held accountable for the deaths of about 24 children and 62 adults. The congressional hearings into the extraordinary miscalculation that produced this horror must not become a cover-up dominated by liberal hostility toward religion and gun ownership. The excuse given by Atty. Gen. Reno is that the FBI's hostage team was fatigued and could not indefinitely continue in place. Out-waited and impatient, something had to be done. So the FBI played directly into David Koresh's hands and fulfilled his prophecy. Throughout the long siege the media have regaled us daily with reports that Koresh believed that he was destined for persecution and that he and his followers would die in a violent confrontation with the secular state. The FBI cannot claim to have been unaware of his views. In a brief- ing last month, a senior FBI official said: "From the mid-'80s on, he's preached that their group will end up in a violent confrontation with law enforcement and that this will be a fulfillment of his prophecy." Fully armed with all the facts, the federal government set out to bring the tragedy to pass. Numerous opportunities were ignored to serve Koresh with the warrant on his trips to town or to detain and question him about the government's suspicion that he possessed illegal firearms. Instead, 100 armed agents of the Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms division of the Treasury Department unexpectedly assaulted the compound. The agents dressed themselves in black assault uniforms and brought the TV cameras along to record their exploits, but their assault was repelled by the Branch Davidians, with loss of lives and injuries on both sides. Then the FBI showed up with tanks and armored vehicles. The FBI let the tensions build up for 50 days and then broke into the building with a tank and attacked with tear gas. The black inmates who had taken over the Lucasville, Ohio, prison and murdered both inmates and guards were shown a great deal more understanding. True to form, many liberals have rushed forward to blame the Waco disaster on the Second Amendment which permits Americans to own guns. To the contrary, it happened precisely because of federal laws regulating gun ownership. The Branch Davidians hadn't assaulted anyone. They lived peacefully within the community. Except for the federal gun laws, they would all still be alive. The liberals' premise that gun ownership should be illegal, or in the least heavily regulated, has created the atmosphere in which the ATF, like an unthinking bully, feels compelled to increasingly and brazenly show its presence. That is what produced the deaths of 86 children, women and men. An embarrassed attorney general lamely blames her "fatigued agents" and "reports" that babies were being beaten and children molested. After the event, she pleads the Clintons' concern with children to justify setting in motion a plan that gets all the children killed. Some solution. But it shows once again the utter incompetence of the federal government. Why anyone would want it more involved in our lives is inexplicable.