From: [a--e--r] at [kauri.vuw.ac.nz] (I. Aptekar) Newsgroups: alt.drugs Subject: MJ and Driving Date: 17 Sep 1993 04:27:22 GMT Copied from p.223 of 'Drugs and Behavior' by William A. McKim. Marijuana and Driving There have been numerous studies on the effects of marijuana on driving. These have been plagued by the same difficulties as other performance studies and subsequently, there are a great variety of conclusions. Early studies generally found that marijuana smoking had little effect on driving[1], but later studies have been able to detect a slight detrimental effect. One experiment tested subjects after a low and a high dose of marijuana on both a closed course and on a crowded city street. The experiment was designed so that each subject was tested several times and so some improvement with practice was expected. In fact, in the placebo group, 38% showed a significant improvement in their driving and 14% got worse. In the high-dose marijuana group, only 14% improved significantly and 55% got worse. The findings were similar on the crowded street. The elements of driving that were most affected in this study were concentration and judgment[2]. Driving studies in a driving simulator have shown that marijuana has little effect on the ability to control a car, but impairs the subject's ability to attend to peripheral stimuli. Thus, marijuana-intoxicated drivers might be able to stop a car as fast as they normally could, but they may not be as quick to notice things that they should stop for. This is probably because they are attending to internal events rather than what is happening on the road[3]. [1] Grinspoon, L. (1969). Marihuana, _Scientific American_, 221(6), 17-25 [2] Klonoff, H. (1974). Effects of marihuana on driving in a restricted area and on city streets: Driving performance and physiological changes. In L. L. Miller (Ed.), _Marijuana, Effects on human behavior_ (pp. 359-397). New York: Academic Press. [3] Muskowitz, H., Hulbert, S., & McGlothlin, W. H. (1976). Marihuana: Effects on simulated driving performance. _Accident Analysis and Prevention_, 8(1), 45-50.