From: [j n dmy] at [cotton.vislab.olemiss.edu] (James DiGriz) Newsgroups: alt.drugs,talk.politics.drugs Subject: Found in a cigarette carton... (little long) Date: Sat, 27 May 1995 14:53:12 GMT Now, I realize that this should probably be printed in alt.comedy or alt.hypocrisy or some such, but I thought you'd get a kick out of this all the same. It was given to me by a smoker and was found in a carton of Winston Lights: "COME OUT SLOWLY SIR, WITH YOUR CIGARETTE ABOVE YOUR HEAD." "The situation above may seem implausible at first. But right now, the Government is trying to compare cigarettes with heroin and cocaine. They are also proposing to entirely prohibit smoking in public places, company cars, trucks, and any place of business entered by ten or more people a week. "These same proposals could also affect your private home as you could be forbidden to smoke anytime a workman or repairman visits. In addition, a cigarette tax increase of 300% is being considered. (House of Representatives bill No. 3434 and Dept. of Labor, OSHA Docket No. H-122, Indoor Air Quality, Proposed Rule, 4/4/94. See H.R. 3600 and S. 1757) "_This_is_nothing_less_than_an_attempt_at_tobacco_ _prohibition,_something_that_will_have_serious_implications_for_ _Americans._ "Earlier this year, the Canadian Government was forced to rollback the exorbitant cigarette tax they introduced two years ago. Organized criminal gangs controlled a huge smuggling market, creating a climate of fear and violence throughout the country. California, which raised its cigarette taxes to fund health education, reports that 7% of the entire tobacco market consists of illegal cigarettes. (California State Revenue Board) Higher taxes will only make things worse. "Despite the Government's denials, the proposed tax increases and the avalanche of other anti-tobacco legislation are all simply forms of backdoor prohibition. Has the Government given any thought to the consequences? "This opinion is brought to you in the interest of an informed debate by the R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company. We believe that the answer to most smoking issues lies in _accomidation,_ in finding ways in which smokers and non-smokers can co-exist peacefully. For further information please call 1-800-95 NO BAN." MY COMMENTS: If I remember correctly, I believe that the large tobacco companies are major parts of D.A.R.E. One question I have is if the R. J. Reynolds company is one of them. If so, doesn't it seem ironic about this little ad they have? Taste of their own medicine kind of thing. And yes, I know the scientific community is trying to compare tobacco and herion. Let's see what they had to say, shall we? A story done for the _New_York_Times_ had Dr. Jack Hennigfield of the National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA) and Dr. Neal Benowitz of the University of California at San Francisco (UCSF) rank several drugs on a scale of 1 to 6 (six being the least serious, 1 being the most) based on the following criteria: Withdrawl, Reinforcement, Tolerance, Dependence, and intoxication. Here is the chart from that story: Substance Wdl Rif Tol Dep Intoxication Nicotine 3,3 4,4 2,4 1,1 5,6 Heroin 2,2 2,2 1,2 2,2 2,2 Cocaine 4,3 1,1 4,1 3,3 3,3 Alcohol 1,1 3,3 3,4 4,4 1,1 Caffeine 5,4 6,5 5,3 5,5 6,5 Marijuana 6,5 5,6 6,5 6,6 4,4 Notice that nicotine and alcohol each have at least one secion where both doctors gave it a double one, whereas cocaine is the only illicit substance to have two ones in one area (heroin has just one 1, for tolerance). Just thought this'd be interesting to some of you. BTW, I couldn't find a tobacco newsgroup, so if you know of one, I'd appreciate it if you would forward this message (however, make sure there isn't already another copy there first). Thanks! XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X James DiGriz X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX