From [REDACTED] at [thumper.bellcore.com] Wed Jan 5 09:37:41 1994 Received: from thumper.bellcore.com by cica.cica.indiana.edu (920330.SGI/ardent-1.0/jsm) id AA01215; Wed, 5 Jan 94 12:29:42 -0500 Received: from localhost ([REDACTED] at [localhost]) by thumper.bellcore.com (8.6.4/8.6.4) id MAA01780 for [net tank] at [ogre.cica.indiana.edu]; Wed, 5 Jan 1994 12:29:44 -0500 Date: Wed, 5 Jan 1994 12:29:44 -0500 From: [REDACTED] at [thumper.bellcore.com] (Daniel Liebster) To: [net tank] at [ogre.cica.indiana.edu] Subject: Clinton administration has more backbone than anticipated! r w PM-MarijuanaBan 01-05 0281 ^PM-Marijuana Ban,260< ^Clinton Administration Reconsiders Ban on Medical Use of Marijuana< WASHINGTON (AP) _ The Clinton administration is reconsidering the ban on the medical use of marijuana, the Public Health Service confirmed today. ``It is something everyone is anxious to get resolved,'' said Rayford Kytle, spokesman for the service. ``There is a considerable amount of interest, from public inquiries and members of Congress.'' Starting in 1978, the government allowed people suffering from painful, often terminal diseases who had not found relief in traditional medications to apply to the Food and Drug Administration for permission to use marijuana. Advocates contend the illegal drug eases nausea and promotes appetite in people suffering from AIDS or cancer, and can relieve pain. But the Bush administration in 1992 ended the program, banning the medical testing or use of marijuana. Officials said marijuana could be harmful instead of helpful to these patients. The 15 people who were then receiving the drug were allowed to continue, but their doctors were supposed to look into other therapies. Dr. Philip Lee, an assistant secretary in the Department of Health and Human Services and head of the Public Health Service, told reporters in San Francisco on Tuesday that review of the policy had been slowed by the controversy generated by Surgeon General Joycelyn Elders' remarks last month that legalizing drugs might deserve study. Kytle said today he didn't know how far along the review was, but ``it is likely something will happen soon.'' However, he cautioned that reviewing the ban did not necessarily mean it would be reversed. AP-DS-01-05-94 1018EST<