Mimsy Were the Borogoves

Editorials: Where I rant to the wall about politics. And sometimes the wall rants back.

The left says gays are pedophiles

Jerry Stratton, April 6, 2022

Is encouraging pedophilia and child mutilation really an integral part of the LGBT community? Or is this what the institutional left thinks is part of the LGBT community? This is a common pattern for them: complain that common sense laws are bad for some vulnerable community, because that community is inferior or criminal.

Back in 2016, I noticed that memers on the left were using Dr. Frank N. Furter as the epitome of the transgender community, the kind of person you shouldn’t mind using women’s bathrooms.

For those of you who haven’t seen the movie, Furter is a rapist, a child rapist, a murderer, and a cannibal. He shouldn’t just be kept out of women’s bathrooms. He should be kept off of earth.

I assumed then that it was the standard soft bigotry of low expectations that is so endemic among the white left when they talk, for example, about how only whites are able to plan for the future, be logical, and work hard. They say it’s racist not to call blacks lazy. Now, according to the left, it’s sexist not to call gays pedophiles, and hatred to oppose the sexual abuse of children. They seem to truly believe all the racist, sexist, *phobic stereotypes that Democrats have pushed throughout their history. It’s as if all their talk about “helping” vulnerable communities is just an excuse to continue their exploitation of these communities.

It’s obvious that the white left believes blacks are inferior, at least inferior to the white left. They proclaim it publicly. But do they really believe that gays are naturally pedophiles, that transgenders want to mutilate children?

It sure seems that way. The relevant text of the Florida law is:

A school district may not adopt procedures or student support forms that prohibit school district personnel from notifying a parent about his or her student's mental, emotional, or physical health or well-being, or a change in related services or monitoring, or that encourage or have the effect of encouraging a student to withhold from a parent such information. School district personnel may not discourage or prohibit parental notification of and involvement in critical decisions affecting a student's mental, emotional, or physical health or well-being.

Classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in kindergarten through grade 3 or in a manner that is not age-appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards.

That’s what the left is up in arms about.

One of the complaints from the right about the the Florida bill is that it only applies to kindergarten through third grade. Encouraging pedophilia in fourth graders? Just fine. Encouraging the removal of body parts from high-school students? No problem. Given the handful of Florida teachers complaining about no longer being able to talk about their sex life to their kindergarteners now that the bill’s passed, shouldn’t the law’s protections be extended to all ages?

But think about that for a moment. The institutional left, from Democrats to Disney, they’re panicking about a bill that outlaws encouraging pedophilia and child mutilation in kindergartners through third grade. These are children aged five through nine.

They’re having to make up complete lies about the bill in order to cover up for what they’re actually saying: that teachers should be able to encourage sex and child mutilation at third grade and earlier. They want this for five-year-old through nine-year-old children.

Their lies are blatant and obvious because of the limitations of Florida’s bill. They would not be so blatant and obvious if the age limit were eighth grade, or twelfth grade. They would have used young adults as their examples, and they would have become pedantic about the difference between pedophilia and attraction to older children, or about destigmatizing pedophiles as “minor-attracted persons”. They’re doing just that in attempting to whitewash Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson’s leniency toward child pornography.

By limiting the law to nine-year-olds and younger, the left will still try playing their word games but it is blatantly obvious that they’re lying. The law isn’t about seventeen or eighteen year-olds. It’s about five to nine- year-olds. The left isn’t trying to protect some right to discuss sexual activity with seventeen or eighteen year-olds, but rather to discuss sexual activity with kindergartners and third-graders.

Even though the epidemic of high school teachers having sex with their students shows a need for laws like this for older children, we can’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good. And the way that this law is baring the motives of the left is commendable: they want sex with children and they want the chemical and physical mutilation of children. There is no fig leaf of teenagers or young adults to fall back on, itself far from sane. They want to be able to encourage sex with children under ten, and the chemical and surgical mutilation of children under ten.

When people look back at our era, one of our greatest sins will be our tolerance for the murder, mutilation, and exploitation of children.

It’s insane. The left is resegregating schools in order to teach racial hatred, killing Title IX protection for women’s sports by redefining men as women, engaging in a massive destruction of minority communities by killing their babies, and now reintroducing child sex and genital mutilation. The left and the beltway class in general are about to give us a Supreme Court justice who thinks the sexual exploitation of children is not such a big deal. It’s like some insane mad prophet scheme to force a totalitarian religious bigotry onto America rivaling anything in the Middle East.

April is National Child Abuse Prevention Month, and the beltway left seems hell-bent on mainstreaming child abuse.

Back in 2017, I wrote that:

Most of DC believes this: that it is their job to force themselves on us. There are several old jokes about the difference between government and a prostitute, all of them involving government not respecting the boundaries of common decency. But as long as we let them believe that government’s job is to force us to act against our will, it’s no joke. Politicians will continue to believe not just that they can get away with abusive behavior, but that they deserve commendation for it.

Now they’re not just forcing us to accept deviant behavior, they’re forcing us to accept deviant behavior toward children. The left is tying the LGBT community to pedophilia just as they accuse minorities of inferiority, and for the same evil purposes.

In response to The child sex of the anointed: There’s nothing so uncommon as common sense in DC, and the Washington Post epitomizes the nonsensical vision of the anointed with Betsy Karasik’s article proposing legalizing sex between high school teachers and high school students “absent extenuating circumstances”.

  1. <- Weinstein vs. Spacey