Peace activists and suicide bombers
Unlike James Lileks, I am a big fan of Kurt Vonnegut’s fiction, and I will continue to be. I still tend to agree with most of what Lileks says about Vonnegut’s support for suicide bombers as it was reported in The Weekend Australian’s US author lauds suicide bombers:
“They are dying for their own self-respect,” [Vonnegut] said. “It’s a terrible thing to deprive someone of their self-respect. It’s like your culture is nothing, your race is nothing, you’re nothing.”
Personally, I think it’s a worse thing to deprive someone of their own self-life.... You have to admit that it’s better to be alive, even if you have to deal with VOA satellite transmissions telling you your race is so worthless that it deserves a democracy like Iowans and Britons and Japanese. Oh, we could just nuke your cities and take your oil, but we hate you so much we’re going to stay here and bleed and force your warring factions to hold subcommittee meetings on the constitutional process. It’s bored our people to tears; now it’s your turn.
But, I do have to take issue with his comment about the article itself:
Vonnegut is described in the article as a “peace activist.”
As a wise giant said in The Princess Bride•--“You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.”
What Australian journalist David Nason actually wrote as far as I can tell is:
Vonnegut’s comments are sharply at odds with his reputation as a peace activist...
It seems to me that Nason knew exactly what “peace activist” means when he wrote that.
Further, Lileks opines on whether this will mean that Vonnegut’s reputation will be sullied among journalists and reviewers, and guesses that it won’t. But the answer is in the article, where the journalist ends with:
But Vonnegut’s latest comments are likely to make many people wonder if old age has finally caught up with a grand old man of American letters.
Now, I’d like to see the full transcript before passing judgement on Vonnegut, but it certainly seems to me that Lileks’s fears about the meaning of “peace activist” are unfounded, at least with regard to this article.
- At Least Ezra Pound was Nuts
- “What’s the matter with us? Do we excuse everything because it kicks Bush in the nuts?”
- Kurt Vonnegut
- “Vonnegut has typically used science fiction to characterize the world and the nature of existence as he experiences them. His chaotic fictional universe abounds in wonder, coincidence, randomness and irrationality.”
- US author lauds suicide bombers
- “One of the greatest living US writers has praised terrorists as ‘very brave people’ and used drug culture slang to describe the ‘amazing high’ suicide bombers must feel before blowing themselves up.”
- The Princess Bride•
- A light-hearted fantasy about swords, miracles, and revenge!
More unreasoning partisanship
- The ruling class’s unexpectedly old clothes
- I recently ran across early use of “unexpectedly” for a conservative’s strong economy, referring to the early 1981 market recovery under President Reagan.
- Why do gun owners think the left wants to take our guns?
- Gun owners think the left wants to take away guns because the left keeps refusing commonsense gun laws in favor of laws that ban guns.
- Corpseman resurrected: correcting Betsy DeVos
- The left has once again decided that the way those people speak is ignorant, and that those people are too stupid to hold public office.
- Why is the country so divided?
- Because you keep trying to tell everyone else what to do.
- Divisive double standards
- It’s a hypocritical form of divisiveness, calling for togetherness and reason whenever your side commits a crime, and engaging in unreasoning partisanship when you can find some way to pin it on others.
- 32 more pages with the topic unreasoning partisanship, and other related pages