Mimsy Were the Borogoves

This is just a quick update on why “engagement algorithms” really mean farming anger: that is, what the financial stakes are that encourage artificially inflating engagement. Or at least, it started as a quick update. It quickly went off into the fields of effective advertising, and the ancient debate over eyeballs vs. sales.

Several social media sites reward people for delivering eyeballs—that is, for drawing in viewers and readers. Just as Facebook has discovered, one of the easiest ways to get eyeballs and to keep eyeballs is to encourage rage and hatred. The common term for this is “rage baiting”. It’s become such a common practice that it’s already progressed, language-wise, to a single-word contraction, “ragebaiting”.

This is what Facebook’s algorithm is designed to encourage, and this example (from X, not Facebook) is the first concrete example I’ve been blessed to find describing how much money is involved. I couldn’t find anything like this when I wrote Facebook is designed to kill relationships.

The wages of ragebait.

When you look at these numbers, remember that they are basically affiliate payments. When affiliates are linked directly to sales, such payments run from a fraction of a percent to, at the very high end, four percent, which would mean multiplying by anywhere from twenty-five up to two hundred to get the actual gross profits involved. But social media posts aren’t generally tied directly to sales, only indirectly as delivering eyeballs of potential sales.

Much as the purpose of television shows on broadcast television was to draw in viewers to watch television ads, the purpose of posts on social media is to draw in readers to watch Internet ads. Very few of the viewers or the readers actually convert into buyers. So you’d have to multiply again by two and probably much more for the actual figures involved on X’s side of the ledger.

Also available in print.

This is the second of four addendums I’ve queued up to my three-parter revisiting the refrigerator revolution. That series was originally meant to cover 1928, 1942, and 1947; the latter just barely predated the modern near-universality of home refrigerator ownership. But as I delve deeper into the origins of the home refrigerator/freezer era, it is becoming almost literally the bottomless pit of fascinating fridge finds!

There is always something more interesting just around the corner. While wandering an antique mall over the 2024 Thanksgiving holiday, I ran across this 1927 General Electric refrigerator manual (PDF File, 22.3 MB). It looked interesting, but (a) it was unpriced, and (b) it was missing at least one page. It also wasn’t the first printing, which meant I’d need to do some research anyway before buying it.

Facebook’s algorithm is designed to break up families and friendships. Creating strife is literally what its algorithms do. It’s what they mean by the extremely euphemistic term “engagement”. Friends don’t have to stay engaged. Family doesn’t have to stay engaged. Friends and family don’t have to keep in constant touch to remain friends and family. Both can go for months, even years, with no contact, get together, and it’s as if they’ve never been apart. We’ve all seen it. We’ve all experienced it. And that would be death for Facebook.

Facebook’s business model requires constant engagement. Their designers have decided that the easiest way to get constant engagement is with constant arguments. Only enemies must remain engaged. It’s what being an enemy means. Enemies are also easier to manipulate, because despite their constant engagement they rarely communicate. Enemies are easier to keep staring at the screen, alert for the next offense, ready to loose the next scathing attack.

It’s a lot like what Norbert Wiener^• talked about in The Human Use of Human Beings.

…when there is communication without need for communication, merely so that someone may earn the social and intellectual prestige of becoming a priest of communication, the quality and communicative value of the message drop like a plummet. — Norbert Wiener (The human use of human beings: Cybernetics and Society)

How often have you seen an event in your main feed, only to realize that it happened yesterday, or even last week, but Facebook is only showing it to you now? And yet day after day Facebook sorts the arguments and the nasty memes right to the top? Events don’t create online engagement. They create offline engagement.

It’s easier to keep eyeballs on ads when everyone is an online enemy. Much harder when they’re an offline friend.

Also available in print.

I’ve written so far about refrigerators in the twenties and refrigerators in the forties. While traveling over the Thanksgiving holiday last year I found an interesting Westinghouse book from 1937 or 1938. It provides a great opportunity to fill the gap and look at the thirties. If I’m right about the age, this book came out well after the end of Prohibition and well before the end of the Depression. Those who were paying attention to world affairs could see another Great War on the horizon, but for most people domestic concerns were a far greater priority.

The Westinghouse Kitchen-Proved Refrigerator Book (PDF File, 11.6 MB)—also available in print—is undated but has a drawing inside that matches Westinghouse’s 1937 and early 1938 advertisements in magazines such as Good Housekeeping and The Saturday Evening Post. I suspect that the book is from 1937, because all of the ads from 1938 that feature this refrigerator and that include a month are from very early in the year.

A great cookbook and a great piece of refrigerator history.

Frigidaire Recipes was the first entry in my Refrigerator Revolution: Revisited series. It came out before I started making reprints available. So I thought I’d take this as an opportunity to revisit it at the same time that I publish the Frigidaire Recipes reprint. Frigidaire Recipes (PDF File, 15.5 MB) is a wonderful book. It was, in fact, the inspiration for starting this series. While I’d already had the other books in the series, the 1928 Frigidaire Recipes was such an incredible peephole into the early years of the home refrigerator/freezer that I couldn’t stop thinking about what it meant about how home refrigerators changed home cooking.

“How To Enjoy Greater Satisfaction From Your Refrigerator”

Like Montgomery Ward’s 1942 Cold Cooking, the Borg-Warner Corporation’s 1947 Norge Cold Cookery and Recipe Digest (PDF File, 10.2 MB) is marketed towards owners and potential owners of the company’s refrigerator. It’s not just a manual, but a cookbook full of reasons to use the product. While Borg-Warner was headquartered in Detroit, the Norge plant, according to this book, was across the state in Muskegon. Borg-Warner still exists; Norge long since hasn’t, although they seem to have continued in some form, probably in-name-only, up to 2006.

This is the third in a series about the first decades of the home refrigeration revolution. While I won’t be going past 1947 I will fill in some of the gaps between 1928 and 1947 with at least two more posts over the coming year. Here’s the series so far:

The first part of Cold Cookery extols the wonders of the Norge “Rollator” refrigerator. It describes how to maintain the appliance and outlines how to use it: which shelves to store which kinds of food on, how to adjust the dial for freezing times, that sort of thing. The freezer section of this 1947 refrigerator was still tiny, though it did have a separate set of freezer shelves for ice cubes and frozen desserts in addition to the main freezer box.

In the 1931-1946 editions of The Joy of Cooking, Irma Rombauer wrote at the start of her section on Bombes and Mousses:

Today similar recipes are to be found in any book on Iceless Refrigeration. Modern equipment has made these dishes commonplace, but for me they retain a certain glamour associated with distinguished company, conviviality and the easy flow of intellectual conversation.—Irma S. Rombauer, The Joy of Cooking, p. 689

By “iceless refrigeration” she meant electric refrigerator/freezers. It’s fascinating that she chose to capitalize the phrase, much like Frigidaire eschewed articles when referring to their refrigerator in Frigidaire Recipes in 1928. By 1942 (and then 1947 for my upcoming third installment) Montgomery Ward didn’t title their manual as if choosing their brand was a lifestyle choice, as Frigidaire had. They titled it “Cold Cooking” much as Osterizer would title their blender manual decades later “Spin Cookery”. It was an Appliance That Does Things. It Cold Cooks.

“Maybe batteries aren’t the best way to store energy.”

Francis Turner has a slightly different take than I did on What will a useful electric car look like?. But he starts from a very similar observation, that most writers on battery-operated vehicles “are missing the point. We don’t want batteries, we want efficient energy storage.” And there is a mountainous difference between the energy storage needs of portable electronic devices and transportation devices, i.e., cars.

He also goes into something I only mentioned tangentially, which is that energy storage for evening out intermittent power sources such as wind and solar is so many orders of magnitude different than portable electronic devices that it’s crazy we’re even considering using the same storage technology to handle it. The money we’re spending on trying to shoehorn traditional batteries into storing grid-level power would be far more effective using other energy storage techniques—and unlike the energy storage needed for battery-powered vehicles, we already know what grid-level storage techniques can look like!

He also comes to the conclusion that, because gasoline is so comparatively useful at energy storage, the best “battery” for electric vehicles will be “synthetic hydrocarbons”, that is, man-made gasoline created from the energy generated by intermittent sources. I suspect that this overlooks how incredibly poorly-matched modern wind and solar technologies are to mass energy generation (in his defense he’s explicit about not discussing this), but when we do find a good means of generating mass intermittent power synthetic gasoline probably will be the best way to store it. As I wrote in a footnote to my post, “I wouldn’t be surprised if the eventual winning ‘battery’ technology ends up looking a lot like a synthetic gasoline.”